Advantages of using the ARGOS 2 system

Alain Goasguen - Michel Guigue
CLS - Service Argos, 8-10 rue Hermès, Parc Technologique du Canal
31526 Ramonville St-Agne France
January 2002

1. Shifting the frequency
2. The Argos-2 generation satellites
3. The evolution of the constellation in 2002
4. Some test results obtained on the Argos-2 band


1. Shifting the frequency

The first of the different actions to encourage manufacturers to spread frequencies over the entire Argos-1 bandwidth started two years ago. Since the beginning of 1999, representatives from CLS, SAI and Cubic-I visited all of the major transmitter manufacturers. These visits were followed by a global meeting in September 1999 where once again the importance of frequency spreading was stressed. This communication process was followed by the Argos International Users Conference in April 2001 with a complete presentation of results regarding the improvement of data due to the shift of transmission frequency.

The processing of the frequencies received from PTT's over the past two and a half years shows that, little by little, the manufacturers are spreading the frequencies out. Some manufacturers such as Microwave Telemetry (USA) or Serpe IESM (FR) are already taking advantage of these results either to track animals over Europe even with very low output power (250 mWatt or even lower), or to track vessels when they are fishing in large groups close together.


2. The Argos-2 generation satellites

Since May 1998, NOAA has launched satellites with the second generation of Argos instrument. Advantages of using the Argos-2 system include:

  • Quality of the transmission link is globally enhanced because of the greater sensitivity of the Argos receiver (an increase of 3 dBm, higher number of Data Processing Units (8 vs. 4 for Argos-1) and larger receiver bandwidth (80 kHz instead of 24).

  • Because there will be fewer (none today) transmitters in these Argos-2 channels the competition between messages arriving at the antenna is dramatically reduced. Hence many more messages are received with a better quality.

  • This benefit will even be greater for low-power transmitters which are significantly affected by competition with higher-power transmissions.

To sum up the situation, the graph below compares the elementary probability of reception by Argos-1 and 2 satellites vs. the platform density.

This figure shows that for a defined population of beacons, Argos-2 satellites have a higher probability of reception than Argos-1 satellites .

Today 2 satellites from this second generation (NOAA 15 and 16) are flown and used by NOAA to make the "operational" system. Three more satellites complete this constellation for those who are working in "Multisat" service (NOAA 14 launched in December 1994 with only real time service, NOAA 12 launched in May 1991 and part of NOAA 11 launched in September 1988 with only global processing).


3. The evolution of the constellation in 2002

A new NOAA satellite, NOAA M (17), will be launched in Mid 2002. It will carry the second generation of Argos instruments. At that time, and due to the great age of NOAA 11, it is likely that NOAA modify the constellation as described below:

  • NOAA 16 and NOAA 17 will become the "operational" system,
  • NOAA 15, NOAA 14 and NOAA 12 will be included in Multisat service.

In other words, by mid 2002, the full constellation will consist of 3 satellites from the second generation and 2 satellites from the first one.

In addition to this evolution, the system will be improved, by November 2002, with a new Japanese satellite (ADEOS II) with Argos downlink capability onboard the payload. This satellite will have the same characteristics as the Argos-2 generation plus it will have the downlink function. As a consequence, by the end of this year our system will include four (4) satellites from the second generation (NOAA 16, 17, 15 and ADEOS II) plus 2 satellites from the first generation. Thus, transmitters working on the upper end of the frequency band (reserved for low output power beacons) can be received by 4 "new" satellites.

With this information along with the graph below showing the current Argos PTT frequency distribution, a decision to transmit outside the central frequency band is clearly interesting for both users and manufacturers.

To complete this information note the launch of NOAA N (NOAA 18) carrying an Argos-2 instrument will occur in June 2004. After this launch there will be 5 Argos-2 satellites.


4. Some test results obtained on the Argos-2 band

Some test results obtained in 2001 are illustrated below,. The main conclusions of these tests were that in all conditions of output power and geographical area, the shift of frequency improves the:

  • A. Bit Error Rate on long or short messages (results presented are obtained from a low=power Microwave Telemetry transmitter located in the US)

  • B. the number of received messages, i.e. the number of locations (results presented obtained from a transmitter located in Europe)


(*Nota : No Test has been done at +10 kHz)

Data from additional testing is summarized in the graph below. The conclusion from this data is: ARGOS PERFORMANCE IS BETTER WHEN YOU TRANSMIT DATA AT 0.5 WATT WITH A SHIFT OF 10 KHZ THAN WHEN YOU TRANSMIT AT 1 WATT WITHIN THE CENTRAL FREQUENCY BAND.